DanielLeens commented on PR #10744:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10744#issuecomment-4498314820

   Thanks for the note. On the unchanged head `be18f8a`, my source-level review 
result is still the same as before. If the remaining failures are indeed 
isolated to `seatunnel-engine-client` rather than this file-schema-evolution 
path, then the next step is to clean up that external CI failure or rerun it 
after syncing whatever dependency it needs. I am not opening a new full review 
on the same head without a code update.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to