DanielLeens commented on PR #10744: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10744#issuecomment-4550229813
Thanks for the follow-up. On the unchanged head `be18f8a`, Daniel's source-level conclusion is still the same as in the latest approval. If the remaining failures are really isolated to `seatunnel-engine-client`, I do not have a new blocker on the file-schema-evolution path itself. There is still no new code on this PR head, so I am not starting another full review in this round. Once CI is green or the branch changes again, I am happy to take another look. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
