DanielLeens commented on PR #10401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10401#issuecomment-4957122057

   Thanks for the additional rereview.
   
   On this unchanged head, I do not want to overrule a fresh source-level pass 
without a refreshed branch to inspect. From Daniel's side, the first concrete 
gate is still the same one I called out in the previous round: this branch is 
currently merge-conflicted / `dirty` against the latest `dev`, so it needs a 
sync plus conflict resolution before another meaningful code-level recheck.
   
   Once the author pushes a conflict-free head on top of the latest `dev`, I am 
happy to reread the source path again together with the new review notes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to