nielifeng commented on issue #11437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11437#issuecomment-5041974843

   I reproduced the same fixed-slot restore and cleanup failure again on 
current upstream `dev`,
   using a concurrent workload that occupies 15 of 16 fixed slots.
   
   Tested conditions:
   
   - `3.0.0-SNAPSHOT`, `dev` commit `dbead9b01fc42ddc5a7f8699311ebf52dbb5d937`
   - three Masters and two Workers, eight fixed slots per Worker
   - `job-schedule-strategy: WAIT`, `dynamic-slot: false`, checkpoint storage 
enabled
   - three streaming FakeSource -> Console jobs, parallelism 4 each
   - total allocation: 15 task groups/slots, one free slot
   
   All three jobs were `RUNNING`, had successful checkpoints with zero 
failures, and sustained
   normal throughput before terminating only the Active Master process.
   
   After the Master transition, all three jobs entered `PENDING/RESTORE`, QPS 
became zero, and no
   further checkpoint completed during a five-minute recovery window. The 
pending diagnostics for
   each job were:
   
   ```text
   totalTaskGroups=5, allocatedTaskGroups=0, lackingTaskGroups=5
   failureReason=RESOURCE_NOT_ENOUGH
   failureMessage=Slot request future not created
   ```
   
   The cluster still reported 15 assigned fixed slots while the restored jobs 
tried to allocate a
   new set of task groups. Cancelling all jobs cleared the running and pending 
job counts, but left
   only 1 of 16 slots free for more than two minutes. Restarting the two Worker 
services was required
   to restore all 16 slots.
   
   This confirms that #11437 remains reproducible on latest `dev` and extends 
the previous
   single-job evidence to concurrent fixed-slot workloads. The tested `dev` 
build does not include
   PR #11458, which remains open.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to