DanielLeens commented on PR #11458: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11458#issuecomment-5129181207
Thanks @nielifeng, this extra baseline reproduction is very helpful. I read it as additional evidence for the original fixed-slot failover problem, not as validation of the current PR head. No new code was pushed after Daniel's previous review, so I am not reopening a full code review in this pass. When the PR is updated, the 3-Master / 3-Worker / 24-slot case you described would be a good acceptance scenario to use alongside the existing coverage. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
