DanielLeens commented on PR #11271: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11271#issuecomment-5141521937
Thanks @nielifeng for adding the runtime verification details. That evidence is helpful and matches the source-level path Daniel rechecked earlier. From Daniel's side, I still do not see a reopened blocker on this unchanged head: the restored incremental split is pruned against the current captured table set before it is added back to the reader queue, and your restore/run verification covers the key user scenario. The remaining step is the normal maintainer review / merge gate handling if GitHub still requires it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
