FenjuFu commented on issue #11638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11638#issuecomment-5177505056

   I audited current main for literal   yrantlucifer/ references. The actual 
Docker image dependencies are concentrated in seatunnel-e2e-common (the other 
search hits in file connector tests/docs are test paths such as 
   ame=tyrantlucifer, not image names):
   
   - Spark:     yrantlucifer/spark:2.4.6 (Spark2Container) and  
yrantlucifer/spark:3.3.0 (Spark3Container).
   - Flink:     yrantlucifer/flink:1.13.6-scala_2.11_hadoop27, 
1.14.6-scala_2.11_hadoop27, 1.15.3-scala_2.12_hadoop27, 
1.16.0-scala_2.12_hadoop27, 1.17.2-scala_2.12_hadoop27, 
1.18.0-scala_2.12_hadoop27, and 1.20.1-scala_2.12_hadoop27 in the corresponding 
Flink*Container classes.
   
   That means the directly affected execution paths are the shared Spark 2/3 
and Flink 1.13-1.18/1.20 E2E environments, rather than individual file 
connector modules.
   
   There is an existing architecture-selection precedent in 
connector-cdc-oracle-e2e (AbstractOracleCDCIT#getImage, checking os.arch == 
aarch64) and a multi-arch image precedent noted in connector-cdc-postgres-e2e.
   
   For an incremental first slice, I suggest publishing the Dockerfiles/build 
metadata in-repo and rebuilding the two Spark tags as linux/amd64,linux/arm64, 
since that covers both shared Spark environments with two images. If an 
Apache-managed registry/namespace is available, I can prepare the 
container-class updates and buildx workflow against the agreed image names; 
otherwise changing Java references before a durable image destination exists 
would leave the tests unusable. Please confirm the preferred registry path and 
where these Dockerfiles should live, and I'll take that slice.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to