SEZ9 commented on issue #11769: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11769#issuecomment-5453408005
@NaughtyYang thanks — that is exactly the validation we need, and nothing is blocked on our side. Testing directly against the #11883 branch is the right next step, since your earlier runs on tag `2.3.12` with #9942 and #10793 applied manually confirmed those patches alone are not sufficient for your scenario. Two small asks for when you run the test: 1. Please share the result either way — a confirmation that the failure is gone is just as valuable as the error logs if it still reproduces. If it does reproduce, the log snippet around the `08S01` / reconnect / replay step would be the most useful part. 2. If possible, note the exact build or commit of the #11883 branch you tested against, so we can tie the result precisely to the fix candidate. Once we have your result, we can compare it against the regression coverage in #11879 and decide whether #11883 fully closes the remaining gap on the multi-table + `generate_sink_sql = true` path, or whether more work is needed before merge. Thanks again for the thorough retesting throughout this thread. <!-- streview-comment:629 --> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
