DanielLeens commented on issue #11769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/11769#issuecomment-5478145271

   Thanks for taking the time to test this and for attaching the code you ran. 
I downloaded the ZIP and compared its scope with the current repair path before 
replying.
   
   The good news is that your field result is directionally useful: two weeks 
without the old failure suggests the fix direction around the JDBC sink 
lifecycle is probably right.
   
   But I would not treat this attachment as proof that `#11883` itself closes 
the issue yet, for two concrete reasons:
   
   1. your note explicitly says the local code is not identical to `#11883`;
   2. the ZIP changes five JDBC sink classes (`ConnectionPoolManager`, 
`JdbcConnectionProvider`, `JdbcOutputFormat`, `JdbcSinkWriter`, 
`SimpleJdbcConnectionPoolProviderProxy`), while current `#11883` is still the 
narrower PR under review.
   
   So the maintainer decision here stays the same for now: keep this issue open 
until we can validate the exact active fix path, not a broader local variant.
   
   The most useful next step is one of these:
   
   1. validate the exact `#11883` branch, or a `dev` build that includes its 
final equivalent, against your workload and report the result;
   2. if the extra local changes are the reason it became stable, share the 
minimal delta versus `#11883` so we can judge whether those changes belong in 
the upstream fix or should be split.
   
   The current source evidence still points to an open JDBC sink runtime path 
rather than only a config-syntax gap: `JdbcSinkWriter` still handles pool 
validation separately from generic datasource properties, `#11879` is only the 
regression-test path, and `#11883` remains the active functional-fix review 
path. So I see your result as encouraging evidence, but not closure evidence 
yet.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to