DanielLeens commented on PR #12051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12051#issuecomment-5558564206

   Thanks for pushing this through, @CryoThrust — I pulled run `33960949015` 
directly (job logs, not just the summary) to check your read on the two 
failures myself rather than taking it at face value.
   
   Confirmed both are unrelated to this diff:
   - `all-connectors-it-7 (8, ubuntu-latest)`: the only failure in that shard 
is `AmazondynamodbIT.testAmazondynamodb` — `AssertionFailedError: table 
sink_table is empty`. That's an Amazon DynamoDB Local container/data-visibility 
issue in an entirely unrelated connector module.
   - `rocketmq-connector-it (11, ubuntu-latest)`: all 43 failures/errors trace 
back to `RocketMqConnectorException: ErrorCode:[ROCKETMQ-11] Failed to get 
topic min and max topic` and `waitConsumedOffsetsSynced` timeouts — a RocketMQ 
test-container connectivity flake, not a code issue, and again a module this 
PR's diff never touches.
   
   This PR only changes `CoordinatorServiceTest` under 
`seatunnel-engine-server` (test-only, no production code), and every check that 
could plausibly be affected by that — license/style, unit tests, and the 
engine-v2 suite — is green. There's no plausible mechanism by which a 
test-fixture change in `seatunnel-engine-server` could cause a DynamoDB or 
RocketMQ container to misbehave, so I'm treating these two as pre-existing 
environmental flakes rather than something introduced here.
   
   From my side there's no remaining code-level blocker — my last review 
already confirmed the fix is correct and deterministic, and this closes out the 
only open item (waiting on the real Build result). I'll leave the final "ignore 
vs. rerun those two IT jobs" call to a maintainer with rerun access, but as far 
as this PR's own content goes, I'm satisfied.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to