SEZ9 commented on issue #10443: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/10443#issuecomment-6282747403
@davidzollo Thanks for the suggestion. I'd prefer to keep this issue separate from #10753 and cross-link the two instead. This thread holds the database/storage connector matrix plus the per-row compatibility evidence and ownership, while #10753 is the broader external-source backlog; merging them would make that evidence harder to follow. A link in each direction is enough. @goutamadwant The revised table looks good as the basis for the description. Two adjustments before you update it: - Keep #12828 (CockroachDB JDBC dialect) and #12829 (Couchbase bounded source) recorded as open PRs, not merged work; review and follow-up discussion should stay on those PRs. - Update the Ingres row from "no implementation PR" to an open PR: #12907 by @1328837476-hug, Jdbc-connector scope, with real-Ingres-server validation still pending. The evidence gates already written here stay as-is, in particular the real-endpoint compatibility matrix before any DocumentDB sink work. @1328837476-hug Thanks for picking up the Ingres lane inside the existing Jdbc connector. Please keep the test/CI discussion on #12907 itself, and post back here once the build you mentioned has finished so the tracker row can reflect its state. Since you don't have a licensed Ingres instance, the row will carry "real-server validation open" until someone can run the opt-in test against a real server; if you know of anyone with access, please flag it here. Also confirm in the PR whether the slice is source-only so the separate Ingres sink gap row stays accurate. <!-- streview-comment:1898 --> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
