SEZ9 commented on issue #10443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/10443#issuecomment-6485905208

   @1328837476-hug Thanks for the update — noted that the [Apache-side Build 
check for baa9accfd](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122617993326) has 
passed, following the earlier passing [Build for 
c78993df6](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/121485888733) and the 
successful [fork CI run for 
baa9accfd](https://github.com/1328837476-hug/seatunnel/actions/runs/40538902556).
 Good to see the E2E configuration review follow-up in baa9accfd is now green 
on the Apache side.
   
   For the Ingres row, here is how I'll keep the tracker:
   
   - Status: PR #12907 open, Build passing on baa9accfd, pending merge-conflict 
coordination (tracked in #12907).
   - Real-server validation: still open — the opt-in test and setup 
instructions you included are the path to close this once a licensed instance 
is available. Please post a quick note here when the Actian evaluation license 
comes through, or if it is declined, so the row can reflect that.
   - Ingres sink gap: remains open as a separate item, with the source-first 
boundary you documented in the PR and both source/sink docs.
   
   Remaining asks from my side:
   
   1. Once the dev conflicts in #12907 are resolved, drop a one-line comment 
here so I can refresh the row with the final state rather than tracking each 
intermediate push.
   2. Keep the test/CI discussion in #12907 as you have been doing; this 
tracker only needs the resulting status.
   
   Nothing else is needed from you for this row right now. Thanks for keeping 
the updates concise and well-linked.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:2103 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to