DanielLeens commented on PR #12943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12943#issuecomment-6339303099

   Thanks for your patience. Correction to my preceding upstream-status note: 
[#12938](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12938) merged into `dev` at 
2026-10-22 10:26 UTC (merge `cc54bb433357b4cb45db9cd5d0743589c3111b79`). I 
checked that current dev contains the merge and that its diff restores the 
historical `AbstractMultiCatalogTransform` serialization UID and makes the 
construction-only config transient. My earlier instruction to wait for that fix 
is now superseded.
   
   The archived-wrapper 
`LLMBooleanOutputTest.readsLegacyFactoryWrapperWithValidationDisabled` / 
`InvalidClassException` is the shared unit-test failure identified in the 
preceding review ([affected 
job](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/39702142683/job/119576798534)).
 This head is still `a5230b04653bbdab58cb8d3e4248915a83de714c`; the current 
`dev` comparison is `diverged`, ahead 3 / behind 3. Please sync with the latest 
`dev` and rerun the affected unit checks first, plus any stage whose log showed 
the same archived-wrapper error. Keep unrelated transform-serialization patches 
out of this PR. This is a targeted remedy for that known upstream failure, not 
a claim that syncing fixes every failed stage.
   
   Other failed job families in the same head's run are 
`engine-resource-managers-it`. Their causes/results remain separate; this 
upstream patch does not establish that they pass. The existing 
source/documentation blockers in my preceding review remain open; the upstream 
CI correction clears none of those findings. Required CI and the final 
write-capable maintainer review remain gates. This is a CI-status follow-up 
only, with no new source findings or fresh full-review claim.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to