DanielLeens commented on PR #10858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10858#issuecomment-6473956311

   Thanks for the workflow reminder. Please address the missing exact-head 
Build/discovery gate below using the existing fork workflow. Independently, my 
release-assembly blocker remains open: the downloadable distribution must 
actually receive the upgraded provider promised by the IRSA documentation. 
Enabling or rerunning CI does not establish that packaging contract, and I am 
not changing the source conclusion on this unchanged head.
   
   Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T16:00:28+00:00), head 
`9c3213d8d5849410222770c2aa66f6fb3902f3f1`: 
[Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122618184230) is 
`ACTION_REQUIRED`.
   
   The exact blocking stage is **Build workflow-run detection**: the check says 
no fork Build was found for this SHA. This is not an executed test failure and 
does not by itself prove that fork Actions is disabled. Open the fork Actions 
tab, enable workflows if needed, then manually run the existing Build workflow 
for this PR branch. If a matching run already exists, link it for a maintainer 
to reconcile the aggregate. No empty commit or speculative dependency change is 
requested.
   
   Upstream check: current dev retains the fork-run adoption workflow and its 
scheduled/manual status-refresh path. A base sync alone cannot enable fork 
Actions or supply a missing exact-head workflow run, so I am not prescribing 
sync as the fix for this activation gate.
   
   My [previous source 
conclusion](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10858#pullrequestreview-5651237102)
 remains unchanged, including its independent source/documentation requests. CI 
is not being passed by inference, and this follow-up is not an effective 
approval.
   
   Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 19 / behind 
37, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional 
sync request.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to