DanielLeens commented on PR #11162: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11162#issuecomment-6503449705
Thanks @SEZ9. The existing source/documentation requests in my published review remain open on this unchanged head, including the policy/default compatibility and regression-contract questions. No committed fix is being confirmed from a discussion-only update, and I am not creating a duplicate numbered review. Separately, the current Build is a missing-fork-run action gate. Start/link the existing exact-head fork Build, enabling Actions only if disabled; a sync or dependency bump cannot itself supply that run. Checked 2026-10-29T17:15:07+00:00; head `e9c52313cfba2a64b713f743be95e80a00794072`. [Signal pull request update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40166998382/job/121480690360) = `SUCCESS`; [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/121486382851) = `ACTION_REQUIRED` Comparison: base `dev`, head `e9c52313cfba2a64b713f743be95e80a00794072`, `diverged`, ahead 12 / behind 60; GitHub mergeable state `blocked`. Behind/diverged alone is recorded metadata and does not add a sync request. Daniel has READ repository permission. This is a discussion/CI clarification, not a new complete source review, an effective APPROVED event or dismissal of historical requested changes. A write-capable maintainer must perform any required final approval/dismissal. Thanks for keeping the follow-up focused. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
