DanielLeens commented on PR #12101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12101#issuecomment-6514270799

   Thanks @SEZ9. I rechecked the current code behind your checklist. 
SeaTunnelConfValidateCommand.java:212-217 deliberately drops the raw cause in 
JSON mode while retaining legacy text diagnostics; :219-221 serializes success 
outside the validation catch. The shared sanitizer handles null before 
matching, and structured errors use a non-null fallback. 
ConfigValidationResult.toJson:73-87 uses Jackson nodes for escaping. Both 
user-command pages document schemaVersion/valid/phase/errors and explicitly 
allow diagnostic stdout alongside the result (English :85-87); pure-JSON stdout 
is not the current advertised contract. My prior full review also explicitly 
records the exceptional text-mode path-error classification change, rather than 
claiming byte-for-byte diagnostic compatibility. The remaining result-record 
selection clarification is Low/nonblocking. I therefore keep my source 
clearance and respectfully do not reopen those eight source requests from an 
older checklist. The exact-head 
 Build discovery gate remains actionable: start/link the existing fork Build, 
enabling workflows only if disabled. No sync-only cure, empty commit or 
unrelated dependency change is requested.
   
   Checked 2026-10-30T03:30:37.151877+00:00; head 
`55831abaef1e1aac58988977c1da8e73a27d9417`. [Signal pull request 
update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40168278125/job/121480735658)=`SUCCESS`;
 
[Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/121486172557)=`ACTION_REQUIRED`.
 Base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 6/behind 61; merge `blocked`.
   
   This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not another full 
source review or an effective approval. Daniel has READ repository permission.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to