DanielLeens commented on PR #12165:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12165#issuecomment-6514268681

   Thanks @SEZ9. I agree with keeping the follow-up scope separate. The current 
reviewed head is source-clear and Build-green, but GitHub still reports actual 
merge conflicts. The contributor must sync the latest base and resolve those 
conflicts while preserving both sides, then obtain CI on the resulting new head 
for complete re-review. Final effective approval belongs to a write-capable 
maintainer.
   
   Checked 2026-10-30T03:30:37.151775+00:00; head 
`a932e27a757519fe74a26cb2920966cad853aead`. [Signal pull request 
update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40463709659/job/122617757074)=`SUCCESS`;
 [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122968422970)=`SUCCESS`. Base 
`dev`, `diverged`, ahead 15/behind 64; merge `dirty`.
   
   This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not another full 
source review or an effective approval. Daniel has READ repository permission.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to