rzo1 commented on PR #2849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2849#issuecomment-5088904759

   Verified the premise against the Geronimo 4.0.0 sources — `unassociate()` 
and `begin()`
   are the only places `threadTx` and `transactionTimeoutMilliseconds` get 
cleared, so a web
   request really can strand both on a pooled exec thread. Rolling back at 
request teardown
   is the right fix and matches `TxBeanManaged.commit()`. The 
single-exec-thread test is a
   genuinely good reproduction, and the guard that fails loudly if thread reuse 
didn't happen
   is the right instinct.
   
   The placement rationale is wrong, though, and it should be corrected in the 
javadoc
   because it changes what applications observe:
   
   - The description says the valve runs after 
`ServletRequestListener#requestDestroyed`.
     It's the opposite. I disassembled tomcat-catalina 11.0.23: 
`StandardContextValve` has no
     `fireRequest*` call at all. `StandardHostValve.invoke` fires 
`fireRequestInitEvent` at
     offset 72, invokes the Context pipeline (where `OpenEJBValve` and 
therefore `clean()`
     live) at offset 125, and fires `fireRequestDestroyEvent` only at offset 
327 — after the
     pipeline returns.
   
     So an application `ServletRequestListener` implementing a tx-per-request 
pattern and
     committing in `requestDestroyed` now finds the transaction already rolled 
back, gets a
     WARN on every single request, and an `IllegalStateException` from its own 
`commit()`.
     Filter- and servlet-based patterns are unaffected, so this doesn't 
invalidate the fix —
     but pre-empting `requestDestroyed` is a real behavioural change and 
belongs in the
     javadoc.
   
   - Third uncovered path, more concrete than the async ones: 
`StandardHostValve.invoke`
     calls `throwable()`/`status()` at offsets 195/298/307, after the pipeline, 
and
     `custom()` dispatches the error page through 
`ApplicationDispatcher.include()`, not a
     Pipeline. So `<error-page>` servlets and JSPs run after `clean()` — they 
leak exactly as
     before this PR, and they now also run with the request's transaction 
already rolled back
     and the caller identity already cleared. If you want that covered,
     `OpenEJBSecurityListener.RequestCapturer` on the Host pipeline
     (`TomcatWebAppBuilder:317`) wraps all of it.
   
   Smaller:
   
   - In `OpenEJBValve`, `TransactionCleanup.clean()` is skipped if 
`listener.exit()` throws.
     The async path already gets this right with a nested `finally` — please 
mirror it here.
   - `setTransactionTimeout(0)` pins the very ThreadLocal entry that the
     `CoreUserTransaction.resetError` hunk in this same PR argues against 
pinning. Worth a
     comment explaining why the tradeoff differs, or reading the timeout first 
and only
     resetting when non-zero.
   - The timeout reset is never asserted. `Leaker` sets 
`setTransactionTimeout(120)` with a
     comment saying it must not leak, and then nothing checks it — the branch 
is untested.
   - Unconditional `rollback()` logs an ERROR when the leftover transaction is 
no longer
     rollback-able (already rolled back / marked for rollback by a timeout 
reaper). Check
     `getStatus()` against `STATUS_ROLLEDBACK`/`STATUS_ROLLING_BACK` first, or 
log at debug.
   
   Merge precondition rather than a code comment: please re-run the Jakarta 
Transactions TCK
   and drop the corresponding exclusions in apache/tomee-tck with this, since 
that's the
   harness that surfaced it.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to