boh-inspur commented on pull request #5428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5428#issuecomment-620311830


   > 
   > 
   > Do you see any issue to implement in a consistent way?
   > 
   > uint_8x2 could be also stored as uint16_t, the same as uint8_t. If I am 
not mistaken, this allows us to support {u}int8_tx3 naturally. Right?
   
   
   
   
   > 
   > 
   > Do you see any issue to implement in a consistent way?
   > 
   > uint_8x2 could be also stored as uint16_t, the same as uint8_t. If I am 
not mistaken, this allows us to support {u}int8_tx3 naturally. Right?
   
   Yes, it's other way to stored as uint16_t. And I think the author of the 
type logic may concern about {u}int8_tx3. In my code I've concerned about this 
condition before, but I think maybe it is impossible to use {u}int8_tx3, so the 
logic is not include this type  int8_t*3, but if needed, little modification of 
this code can support {u}int8_tx3.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to