sergei-grechanik commented on a change in pull request #5618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5618#discussion_r444310282



##########
File path: python/tvm/testing.py
##########
@@ -188,5 +189,96 @@ def assert_prim_expr_equal(lhs, rhs):
         raise ValueError("{} and {} are not equal".format(lhs, rhs))
 
 
+def check_bool_expr_is_true(bool_expr, vranges, cond=None):
+    """ Check that bool_expr holds given the condition cond
+    for every value of free variables from vranges.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    bool_expr : tvm.ir.expr.PrimExpr
+        Boolean expression to check
+    vranges: Dict[tvm.tir.expr.Var, tvm.ir.Range]
+        Free variables and their ranges
+    cond: tvm.ir.expr.PrimExpr
+        extra conditions needs to be satisfied.
+    """
+    if cond is not None:
+        bool_expr = tvm.te.any(tvm.tir.Not(cond), bool_expr)
+
+    def _run_expr(expr, vranges):
+        """ Evaluate expr for every value of free variables
+        given by vranges and return the tensor of results.
+        """
+        def _compute_body(*us):
+            vmap = {v: u + r.min for (v, r), u in zip(vranges.items(), us)}
+            return tvm.tir.stmt_functor.substitute(expr, vmap)
+
+        A = tvm.te.compute([r.extent.value for v, r in vranges.items()], 
_compute_body)
+        args = [tvm.nd.empty(A.shape, A.dtype)]
+        sch = tvm.te.create_schedule(A.op)
+        mod = tvm.build(sch, [A])
+        mod(*args)
+        return args[0].asnumpy()
+
+    res = _run_expr(bool_expr, vranges)
+    if not np.all(res):
+        indices = list(np.argwhere(res == 0)[0])
+        counterex = [(str(v), i + r.min) for (v, r), i in zip(vranges.items(), 
indices)]
+        counterex = sorted(counterex, key=lambda x: x[0])
+        counterex = ", ".join([v + " = " + str(i) for v, i in counterex])
+        ana = tvm.arith.Analyzer()
+        raise AssertionError("Expression {}\nis not true on {}\n"
+                             "Counterexample: {}"
+                             .format(ana.simplify(bool_expr), vranges, 
counterex))
+
+
+def check_int_constraints_trans_consistency(constraints_trans, vranges=None):
+    """ Check IntConstraintsTransform is a bijective transformation.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    constraints_trans : arith.IntConstraintsTransform
+        Integer constraints transformation
+    vranges: Dict[tvm.tir.expr.Var, tvm.ir.Range]
+        Free variables and their ranges
+    """
+    if vranges is None:
+        vranges = {}
+
+    def _check_forward(constraints1, constraints2, varmap, backvarmap):
+        ana = tvm.arith.Analyzer()
+        all_vranges = vranges.copy()
+        all_vranges.update({v: r for v, r in constraints1.ranges.items()})
+
+        # Check that the transformation is injective
+        cond_on_vars = tvm.tir.const(1, 'bool')
+        for v in constraints1.variables:
+            # variable mapping is consistent
+            v_back = ana.simplify(tvm.tir.stmt_functor.substitute(varmap[v], 
backvarmap))
+            cond_on_vars = tvm.te.all(cond_on_vars, v == v_back)
+        # Also we have to check that the new relations are true when old 
relations are true
+        cond_subst = tvm.tir.stmt_functor.substitute(
+            tvm.te.all(tvm.tir.const(1, 'bool'), *constraints2.relations), 
backvarmap)
+        # We have to include relations from vranges too
+        for v in constraints2.variables:
+            if v in constraints2.ranges:
+                r = constraints2.ranges[v]
+                range_cond = tvm.te.all(v >= r.min, v < r.min + r.extent)
+                range_cond = tvm.tir.stmt_functor.substitute(range_cond, 
backvarmap)
+                cond_subst = tvm.te.all(cond_subst, range_cond)
+        cond_subst = ana.simplify(cond_subst)
+        check_bool_expr_is_true(
+            tvm.te.all(cond_subst, cond_on_vars), all_vranges,
+            cond=tvm.te.all(tvm.tir.const(1, 'bool'), *constraints1.relations))
+
+    rels = constraints_trans.dst.relations
+    if len(rels) == 1 and tvm.ir.structural_equal(rels[0], False):
+        # not solvable, skip

Review comment:
       You can check that the original constraints are false for all values of 
the variables. I would remove this check completely, I think _check_forward 
should do what is needed automatically or with some minor changes.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to