manupa-arm commented on a change in pull request #7785:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7785#discussion_r620080936
##########
File path: src/runtime/crt/memory/stack_allocator.c
##########
@@ -16,17 +16,22 @@
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/
-
// LINT_C_FILE
-
#include <tvm/runtime/crt/stack_allocator.h>
+#ifdef TVM_CRT_DEBUG
+#include <tvm/runtime/crt/logging.h>
+#endif
void* StackMemoryManager_Allocate(tvm_workspace_t* tvm_runtime_workspace,
int32_t nbytes) {
uint32_t offset_bytes = (~nbytes + 1) & (TVM_RUNTIME_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT_BYTES -
1);
uint8_t* current_alloc = tvm_runtime_workspace->next_alloc;
uint8_t* next_alloc = tvm_runtime_workspace->next_alloc + nbytes +
offset_bytes;
uint8_t* workspace_end = tvm_runtime_workspace->workspace +
tvm_runtime_workspace->workspace_size;
-
+#ifdef TVM_CRT_DEBUG
Review comment:
Cool! I agree that alignment should be considered in a higher-level
memory planning work. :).
However, as shown here, its trivial to support a global alignment (i.e.
addresses produced by the allocator is aligned to a global granularity) might
be beneficial in the mean time.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
