tqchen commented on pull request #9848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9848#issuecomment-1018823768


   Thanks @mbs-octoml . these are accurate summary of the state. I agree with 
you that it is not worth to go with c(high order machinary). Like I said I want 
to mainly clarifying the choices and and suggest documenting the semantics also 
in the IR data structure (assuming there will be alternative versions of device 
planner or consumers of the IR who will need to make use of such information, 
they will the read comments on the data structure for semantics). 
   
   From what I can see the current set of discussions are great and already 
comprehensive and I trust @electriclilies and you to make the call here. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to