[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14322194#comment-14322194
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on WICKET-5837:
----------------------------------------

Github user bitstorm commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/90#discussion_r24726057
  
    --- Diff: 
wicket-core/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/upload/MultiFileUploadFieldTest.java
 ---
    @@ -63,13 +64,16 @@ protected void onSubmit()
                                for (int i = 1; i < 2; i++)
                                {
                                        FileUpload fileUpload = uploads.get(i);
    -                                   
assertEquals(MultiFileUploadFieldTest.class.getSimpleName()+i+".txt", 
fileUpload.getClientFileName());
    +                                   
assertEquals(MultiFileUploadFieldTest.class.getSimpleName() + (i - 1) + ".txt",
    --- End diff --
    
    There's a problem with '(i - 1)'. I've reverted it to simply 'i' and test 
passes with success.  Can you confirm that this change is not necessary?


> JUnit tests may fail because of AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-5837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5837
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 7.0.0-M5, 6.19.0
>            Reporter: Tobias Soloschenko
>            Assignee: Andrea Del Bene
>              Labels: test
>
> Because JSONObject is used in the method 
> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.renderAjaxAttributes(Component,
>  AjaxRequestAttributes)
> which internally uses a HashMap to store the key value pairs - see 
> org.apache.wicket.ajax.json.JSONObject.JSONObject() - it is not ensured the 
> attributes rendered in a specific order. This can cause the unit tests to 
> pass in one run and fail in the next run.
> One suggestion would be to switch the HashMap and replace it with at 
> LinkedHashMap to preserve the insertion order.
> See stack trace in comment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to