[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15380628#comment-15380628
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on WICKET-6203:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit a0c43bb9808c5e6b916e6461b357c3eaa4fa84fc in wicket's branch
refs/heads/master from [~noobymatze]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=wicket.git;h=a0c43bb ]
WICKET-6203 rework IModel#mapWith
> rework IModel#mapWith
> ---------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-6203
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6203
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0-M1
> Reporter: Matthias Metzger
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: newbie
> Original Estimate: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 10m
>
> The IModel#mapWith method actually combines two models using a BiFunction.
> Thus another name like 'combineWith' would be much more descriptive of the
> actual task.
> Furthermore providing the BiFunction to combine the two models as the first
> argument of 'mapWith'/'combineWith' might obscure the other Model used for
> longer lambda expressions, since it will be provided after the lambda
> expression. It might be better to provide the other Model as a first argument.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)