[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270011#comment-17270011
 ] 

Emond Papegaaij commented on WICKET-6861:
-----------------------------------------

No, that won't help. The trigger function clears the timer before it does the 
Ajax call. Adding that precondition will prevent all ajax calls for that timer:
{code:javascript}
Wicket.TimerHandles[timerId] = setTimeout(function() {
        Wicket.Timer.clear(timerId);
        f(); // this does the ajax call and here the timer is is never in 
Wicket.TimerHandles
}, delay);
{code}

Also, if we change the trigger function to not clear {{timerId}}, it will still 
not work, because the Ajax response of the first timer trigger in my event 
trace will set it again. I think the only way to really fix this, is to mark a 
timer as stopped in {{Wicket.TimerHandles}}. For example, we could put 
{{false}} in {{Wicket.TimerHandles[timerId]}} and have {{Wicket.Timer.set}} 
check that. However, that will break restarting a timer. The cause of the 
problem lies in the fact that the timer does not really live on the client side 
while it is executing its Ajax request.

> Possible race condition in clearing and triggering of Wicket timers
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6861
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6861
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket-core
>    Affects Versions: 9.2.0
>            Reporter: Emond Papegaaij
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In our test suite we see some intermittent failures related to 
> {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}}. At a few places in our application, we use a 
> background poller at a 1 sec interval that checks for an out-of-band 
> submission of the form data. So the user either has to fill the form via the 
> web interface or via some other route. Either route can complete the form, 
> but as soon as one of the two is triggered, the other must stop. The race 
> condition lies in the {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}} triggering while the user 
> has already submitted the form manually.
> The naive implementation would stop {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}} via 
> {{Wicket.Timer.clear('timer0')}} in the Ajax response of the form submit. 
> However, this results in a very large gap between the moment of submission 
> and the actual moment the timer is stopped. To fix this, we've added the 
> following code to the {{AjaxSubmitLink}}:
> {code:java}
> @Override
> public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
>     super.renderHead(response);
>     response.render(OnDomReadyHeaderItem.forScript(
>             "Wicket.Event.add('" + getMarkupId() + "', 'click', " +
>             "function() {Wicket.Timer.clear('" + getTimerId() + "');})"));
> }
> {code}
> This puts the call to {{Wicket.Timer.clear}} before the actual Ajax submit 
> and should therefore prevent the timer from triggering after the Ajax submit 
> is done. However, in very rare occurrences we still see the timer triggering. 
> When it happens, the timer is always directly after the Ajax submit (often 
> within 10ms). This makes us believe the current implementation has a race 
> condition in the following way:
> * The user clicks the Ajax submit link
> * The execution of the event handlers is started in the browser
> * At this moment the {{setTimeout}} triggers, but it is suspended because JS 
> is single threaded and the browser is already execution JS in response to UI 
> interaction
> * The first event handler now clears the timer
> * The second event handler performs the Ajax call
> * Now the JS executor is freed and the timer function is executed
> Although I'm not entirely at home in the execution model of JS in a browser, 
> this is the only explanation I could come up with. There is no way to 
> reproduce it, other than run a complex test suite 1000ths of times. My 
> proposed fix is to replace the timeout function in {{wicket-ajax-jquery.js}} 
> in {{Wicket.Timer.set}} with this:
> {code:javascript}
> Wicket.TimerHandles[timerId] = setTimeout(function() {
>     if (timerId in Wicket.TimerHandles) {
>         Wicket.Timer.clear(timerId);
>         f();
>     }
> }, delay);
> {code}
> This should prevent the function {{f()}} to be executed after the timer has 
> been cleared (Wicket.Timer.clear deletes the {{timerId}} from 
> {{Wicket.TimerHandles}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to