[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17270056#comment-17270056
 ] 

Emond Papegaaij commented on WICKET-6861:
-----------------------------------------

That won't work either. In fact, when the server receives the Ajax request, the 
entire http session doesn't even exist anymore. I've added code in our 
application to ignore the request, but somehow all this triggers a CSP 
violation (the nonces don't match) and that causes the test to fail.

One possible solution I've come up with is to queue the {{Wicket.Timer.clear}} 
on the client when an Ajax request for the timer is currently executing. I'll 
see if I can get that working somewhere next week.

> Possible race condition in clearing and triggering of Wicket timers
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6861
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6861
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wicket-core
>    Affects Versions: 9.2.0
>            Reporter: Emond Papegaaij
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In our test suite we see some intermittent failures related to 
> {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}}. At a few places in our application, we use a 
> background poller at a 1 sec interval that checks for an out-of-band 
> submission of the form data. So the user either has to fill the form via the 
> web interface or via some other route. Either route can complete the form, 
> but as soon as one of the two is triggered, the other must stop. The race 
> condition lies in the {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}} triggering while the user 
> has already submitted the form manually.
> The naive implementation would stop {{AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior}} via 
> {{Wicket.Timer.clear('timer0')}} in the Ajax response of the form submit. 
> However, this results in a very large gap between the moment of submission 
> and the actual moment the timer is stopped. To fix this, we've added the 
> following code to the {{AjaxSubmitLink}}:
> {code:java}
> @Override
> public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
>     super.renderHead(response);
>     response.render(OnDomReadyHeaderItem.forScript(
>             "Wicket.Event.add('" + getMarkupId() + "', 'click', " +
>             "function() {Wicket.Timer.clear('" + getTimerId() + "');})"));
> }
> {code}
> This puts the call to {{Wicket.Timer.clear}} before the actual Ajax submit 
> and should therefore prevent the timer from triggering after the Ajax submit 
> is done. However, in very rare occurrences we still see the timer triggering. 
> When it happens, the timer is always directly after the Ajax submit (often 
> within 10ms). This makes us believe the current implementation has a race 
> condition in the following way:
> * The user clicks the Ajax submit link
> * The execution of the event handlers is started in the browser
> * At this moment the {{setTimeout}} triggers, but it is suspended because JS 
> is single threaded and the browser is already execution JS in response to UI 
> interaction
> * The first event handler now clears the timer
> * The second event handler performs the Ajax call
> * Now the JS executor is freed and the timer function is executed
> Although I'm not entirely at home in the execution model of JS in a browser, 
> this is the only explanation I could come up with. There is no way to 
> reproduce it, other than run a complex test suite 1000ths of times. My 
> proposed fix is to replace the timeout function in {{wicket-ajax-jquery.js}} 
> in {{Wicket.Timer.set}} with this:
> {code:javascript}
> Wicket.TimerHandles[timerId] = setTimeout(function() {
>     if (timerId in Wicket.TimerHandles) {
>         Wicket.Timer.clear(timerId);
>         f();
>     }
> }, delay);
> {code}
> This should prevent the function {{f()}} to be executed after the timer has 
> been cleared (Wicket.Timer.clear deletes the {{timerId}} from 
> {{Wicket.TimerHandles}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to