jstuyts commented on PR #1093: URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/1093#issuecomment-2639275752
> This is basically the incremental strategy that JSpecify [recommends](https://jspecify.dev/docs/applying/). Yes, but Wicket is a public project. It is undesirable to have things in a state that is incomplete, I think, as this would result in a lot of errors/warnings for users of Wicket. Doing everything at once would result in a giant PR. I think this one is already stretching the limit. I have a few more coming if this (or the JSpecify variant) is merged, and will make sure those PRs are smaller. So I think that higher-level declarations of (non-)nullability is not an option for now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
