Konstantin, On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> Do you think we can call the version you proposed to release > 2.1.0 or 2.1.0-beta? > > The proposed new features imho do not exactly conform with the idea > of dot-dot release, but definitely qualify for a major number change. > I am just trying to avoid rather ugly 2.0.4.1 versions, which of course > also possible. I'm agnostic to the schemes. During the long discussion we had just 2 months ago, I proposed that 2.1.x be the beta series initially. The feedback and consensus was that it wasn't the right numbering scheme: http://s.apache.org/1j4 thanks, Arun
