Also: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Assuming that you are talking about HDFS features when you say > "features going into a beta on a very short short timetable" and > "laundry list" etc, > No, that would not be a correct assumption. So these features are not something that are impulsively developed > and irresponsibly pushed to a release. They have gone through > considerable testing and have been developed over a long time. > There is no need to reframe my comment in combative terms and read in insults that are not there. As I read Arun's mail the plan is to integrate several feature branches into branch-2. That would of course result in brand new never before tested code. I do not believe that should have the label "alpha". This is just my personal opinion. "Shit happens when commits happen." - You know this as well as I. That does not mean I am here to attack or insult you by pointing that out and suggesting more measured alternatives. There is little to gain in engaging in debate club. If you are not interested in hearing these opinions, that is fine, I have received that message already, nothing further need be said. -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
