Hi JIRA and Wiki admins,
I would like permission to assign JIRA issues to myself
and edit Hadoop Wiki pages.
I have already fixed some on HADOOP-10086 and
I think there is further work.
My username is "iwasakims" on JIRA
and "MasatakeIwasaki" on Hadoop Wiki.
Regards,
Masatake Iwasaki
(2014/01/28 15:47), Arpit Agarwal wrote:
Done, thanks guys for finding and fixing doc issues!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Akira AJISAKA
<ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>wrote:
Thank you for reviewing and committing, Arpit!
HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for
review?
The patch is not ready. I need to add the new metrics for the latest trunk.
I'll create a new patch in this week.
In addition, could you please review HADOOP-9830?
This issue is to fix a typo at the top page and I think it's easy to
review.
Akira
(2014/01/28 6:44), Arpit Agarwal wrote:
I committed the following patches today:
HADOOP-10086
HADOOP-9982
HADOOP-10212
HDFS-5297
Remaining from your initial list:
HADOOP-10139 - needs to be rebased
HDFS-5492 - I will review it this week.
HADOOP-6350 - not sure of the status. Is the attached patch ready for
review?
I will look at the other common/HDFS patches as I get time after this
week,
unless another committer wants to take a look.
Arpit
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Akira AJISAKA
<ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>wrote:
Akira, could you please resend a list of your patches that need
reviewing
if you have it handy.
Here is the list of all the documentation patches I have.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6350?jql=
project%20in%20(HADOOP%2C%20YARN%2C%20HDFS%2C%20MAPREDUCE)%20AND%
20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%
20documentation%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20AND%
20assignee%20in%20(ajisakaa)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
In the above list, the JIRAs I think high priority are as follows:
* HADOOP-6350
* HADOOP-9982
* HADOOP-10139
* HADOOP-10212
* YARN-1531
* HDFS-5297
* HDFS-5492
* MAPREDUCE-4282
I will appreciate your reviews.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/01/22 13:17), Masatake Iwasaki wrote:
> I will review
HADOOP-10086<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10086>this
> week unless another committer gets to it first.
I appreciate it Arpit!
> Thanks for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately
some
> fixes can get lost in the noise and this is true not just for
documentation
> fixes, so thanks for bringing these to our attention.
I will do what I can do to improve this. Such as helping review process.
Regards,
Masatake Iwasaki
(2014/01/22 3:22), Arpit Agarwal wrote:
I will review
HADOOP-10086<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10086>this
week unless another committer gets to it first.
Akira, could you please resend a list of your patches that need
reviewing
if you have it handy.
Thanks for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately
some
fixes can get lost in the noise and this is true not just for
documentation
fixes, so thanks for bringing these to our attention.
Regards,
Arpit
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Akira AJISAKA
<ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>wrote:
Hi All,
I wrote several patches for documentation
but most of them are not reviewed.
I want to improve not only the new features but also
the documents. I also think the documents are not
well maintained mainly because :
* Deprecated commands and parameters still exist.
* Undocumented command options exist.
* There're a lot of dead links.
I'll be happy when the above problems are fixed for 2.4 release.
I'm waiting for your advices and reviews!
Thanks Masatake for this proposal.
Regards,
Akira
(2014/01/21 9:03), Masatake Iwasaki wrote:
Hi developers,
I wrote a patch for Hadoop's site documentation and would like
reviews.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10086
Though I would like to fix documentation further,
there seems to be many open JIRA issues concerning documents.
I think the documents is not well maintained now
because the documentation work does not tend to get
enough attention of reviewers and commiters.
In order to impove the situation,
should I write Wiki pages rather than site documentation
or refactor whole documentation structure
in the way like HBase book (http://hbase.apache.org/book/book.html)?
I will appreciate your advices.
Regards,
Masatake Iwasaki
