+1 to voting on specific workflow(s).
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote: > If we are to start a vote thread, will people prefer a vote thread that > includes potential workflows as well? > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for your opinions, everyone. Looks like most people are for the > > change and no one is against it. Let me start a vote for this. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Thank you for supplementation, Andrew. Yes, we should go step by step > >> and let's discuss review workflows on a another thread. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> - Tsuyoshi > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> > >> wrote: > >> > I think we should take things one step at a time. Switching to git > >> > definitely opens up the possibility for better review workflows, but > we > >> can > >> > discuss that on a different thread. > >> > > >> > A few different people have also mentioned Gerrit, so that'd be in the > >> > running along with Github (and I guess ReviewBoard). > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Andrew > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA < > >> ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thank you for great suggestion, Karthik. +1(non-binding) to use git. > >> >> I'm also using private git repository. > >> >> Additionally, I have one question. Will we accept github-based > >> >> development like Apache Spark? IHMO, it allow us to leverage Hadoop > >> >> development, because the cost of sending pull request is very low and > >> >> its review board is great. One concern is that the development > >> >> workflow can change and it can confuse us. What do you think? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> - Tsuyoshi > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi folks, > >> >> > > >> >> > From what I hear, a lot of devs use the git mirror for > >> >> development/reviews > >> >> > and use subversion primarily for checking code in. I was wondering > >> if it > >> >> > would make more sense just to move to git. In addition to > subjective > >> >> liking > >> >> > of git, I see the following advantages in our workflow: > >> >> > > >> >> > 1. Feature branches - it becomes easier to work on them and keep > >> >> > rebasing against the latest trunk. > >> >> > 2. Cherry-picks between branches automatically ensures the exact > >> same > >> >> > commit message and tracks the lineage as well. > >> >> > 3. When cutting new branches and/or updating maven versions > etc., > >> it > >> >> > allows doing all the work locally before pushing it to the main > >> >> branch. > >> >> > 4. Opens us up to potentially using other code-review tools. > >> (Gerrit?) > >> >> > 5. It is just more convenient. > >> >> > > >> >> > I am sure this was brought up before in different capacities. I > >> believe > >> >> the > >> >> > support for git in ASF is healthy now and several downstream > projects > >> >> have > >> >> > moved. Again, from what I hear, ASF INFRA folks make the migration > >> >> process > >> >> > fairly easy. > >> >> > > >> >> > What do you all think? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > Karthik > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> - Tsuyoshi > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> - Tsuyoshi > >> > > > > > -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
