Thanks for clarifying Vinod.That sounds good to me. --Yongjun
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org > wrote: > It kind of got lost through my email, but when I talked about force-push, > it is almost completely in the context of feature-branch rebase. > > We almost never do force-push outside of this context, neither do we > encourage it. And like I pointed, the fact that the mainline branches > (trunk, branch-2 etc) are already protected against force-pushes, and the > latest infra’s change to notify force-pushes as explicitly marked so, are > good enough for handling them IMO. > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:07 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > I assume we will have at least a committer review of any force-push. Say, > > if the commit history already has x, y, z, now we need to force push with > > x', we'd better not torget y and z, and if there is conflict putting in y > > and z after x', the conflict is better reviewed. > >
