> On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:49 AM, larry mccay <larry.mc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That sounds like a reasonable approach and valid use of branches to me. > > Perhaps a set of functional tests could be provided/identified that would > help the review process by showing backward compatibility along with new > extensions for things like dynamic commands? >
This is going into trunk, so no need for backward compatibility.
