A branch sounds fine, but how are we going to get 3 +1's to merge it? If it's hard to find one reviewer, seems even harder to find two.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Allen Wittenauer < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:49 AM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That sounds like a reasonable approach and valid use of branches to me. > > > > Perhaps a set of functional tests could be provided/identified that would > > help the review process by showing backward compatibility along with new > > extensions for things like dynamic commands? > > > > This is going into trunk, so no need for backward compatibility. >
