Hi Brahma Reddy Battula,

Actually the original link works fine: https://s.apache.org/Dzg4
Your link excludes closed and resolved issues, which needs backporting, and
which we cannot reopen, as discussed in this thread earlier.

Looked through the issues you proposed:

HDFS-9311 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9311>
Seems like a new feature. It helps failover to standby node when primary is
under heavy load, but it introduces new APIs, addresses, config parameters.
And needs at least one follow up jira.
Looks like a backward compatible change, though.
Did you have a chance to run it in production?

+1 on
HDFS-10987 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10987>
HDFS-9902 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9902>
HDFS-8312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8312>
HADOOP-14100 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14100>

Added them to 2.7.4 release. You should see them via the above link now.
Would be good if you could attach backport patches for some of them?

Appreciate your help,
--Konstantin

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula <
brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com> wrote:

>
> Looks following link is not correct..
>
> https://s.apache.org/Dzg4
>
> It should be like following..?
>
> https://s.apache.org/wi3U
>
>
> Apart from Konstantin mentioned,Following also good to go..? let me know
> your thoughts on this.
>
> For Large Cluster:
> =============
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9311===Life Line Protocol
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10987===Deecommission
> Expensive when lot's of blocks are present
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9902===
> "dfs.datanode.du.reserved"  per Storage Type
>
> For Security:
> =========
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8312===Trash does not descent
> into child directories to check for permission
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14100===Upgrade Jsch jar to
> latest version to fix vulnerability in old versions
>
>
>
> Regards
> Brahma Reddy Battula
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Krogen [mailto:ekro...@linkedin.com.INVALID]
> Sent: 06 May 2017 02:40
> To: Konstantin Shvachko
> Cc: Zhe Zhang; Hadoop Common; Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: About 2.7.4 Release
>
> List LGTM Konstantin!
>
> Let's say that we will only create a new tracking JIRA for patches which
> do not backport cleanly, to avoid having too many lying around. Otherwise
> we can directly attach to old ticket. If a clean backport does happen to
> break a test the nightly build will help us catch it.
>
> Erik
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Great Zhe. Let's monitor the build.
> >
> > I marked all jiras I knew of for inclusion into 2.7.4 as I described
> > before.
> > Target Version/s: 2.7.4
> > Label: release-blocker
> >
> > Here is the link to the list: https://s.apache.org/Dzg4 Please let me
> > know if I missed anything.
> > And feel free to pick up any. Most of backports are pretty
> > straightforward, but not all.
> >
> > We can create tracking jiras for backporting if you need to run
> > Jenkins on the patch (and since Allen does not allow reopening them).
> > But I think the final patch should be attached to the original jira.
> > Otherwise history will be hard to follow.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Konstantin
> >
> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Zhe Zhang <z...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for volunteering as RM Konstantin! The plan LGTM.
> > >
> > > I've created a nightly Jenkins job for branch-2.7 (unit tests):
> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-branch2.7-nightly/
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:42 AM Konstantin Shvachko <
> > shv.had...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey guys,
> > >>
> > >> I and a few of my colleagues would like to help here and move 2.7.4
> > >> release forward. A few points in this regard.
> > >>
> > >> 1. Reading through this thread since March 1 I see that Vinod
> > >> hinted on managing the release. Vinod, if you still want the job /
> > >> have bandwidth will be happy to work with you.
> > >> Otherwise I am glad to volunteer as the release manager.
> > >>
> > >> 2. In addition to current blockers and criticals, I would like to
> > propose
> > >> a
> > >> few issues to be included in the release, see the list below. Those
> > >> are mostly bug fixes and optimizations, which we already have in
> > >> our
> > internal
> > >> branch and run in production. Plus one minor feature "node
> > >> labeling", which we found very handy, when you have heterogeneous
> > >> environments and mixed workloads, like MR and Spark.
> > >>
> > >> 3. For marking issues for the release I propose to
> > >>  - set the target version to 2.7.4, and
> > >>  - add a new label "release-blocker"
> > >> That way we will know issues targeted for the release without
> > >> reopening them for backports.
> > >>
> > >> 4. I see quite a few people are interested in the release. With all
> > >> the help I think we can target to release by the end of May.
> > >>
> > >> Other things include fixing CHANGES.txt and fixing Jenkins build
> > >> for
> > 2.7.4
> > >> branch.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --Konstantin
> > >>
> > >> ==========  List of issue for 2.7.4  ===========
> > >> ------ Backports
> > >> HADOOP-12975 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12975>.
> > >> Add
> > du
> > >> jitters
> > >> HDFS-9710 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9710>. IBR
> > batching
> > >> HDFS-10715 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10715>. NPE
> > >> when applying AvailableSpaceBlockPlacementPolicy
> > >> HDFS-2538 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2538>. fsck
> > removal
> > >> of dot printing
> > >> HDFS-8131 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8131>.
> > >> space-balanced
> > >> policy for balancer
> > >> HDFS-8549 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8549>. abort
> > >> balancer if upgrade in progress
> > >> HDFS-9412 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412>. skip
> > >> small blocks in getBlocks
> > >>
> > >> YARN-1471 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1471>. SLS
> > >> simulator
> > >> YARN-4302 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4302>. SLS
> > >> YARN-4367 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4367>. SLS
> > >> YARN-4612 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4612>. SLS
> > >>
> > >> ----- Node labeling
> > >> MAPREDUCE-6304
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6304>
> > >> YARN-2943 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2943>
> > >> YARN-4109 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4109>
> > >> YARN-4140 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4140>
> > >> YARN-4250 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4250>
> > >> YARN-4925 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4925>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Zhe Zhang
> > > Apache Hadoop Committer
> > > http://zhe-thoughts.github.io/about/ | @oldcap
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to