[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731254#action_12731254
]
Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120:
----------------------------------------
bq. All implementations will probably always use a subclass of Generic, but it
feels to me like this API should be more abstract, no?
Absolutely. I realized that but missed to use it in the patch.
bq. reflect should be able to serialize and deserialize private fields. If not,
maybe we should fix that in Avro?
I have filed AVRO-78. At places the avro code uses Class#getFields() instead
of Class#getDeclaredFields()
> Add support for Avro types in hadoop
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6120
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Sharad Agarwal
> Assignee: Sharad Agarwal
> Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch
>
>
> Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
