[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15229608#comment-15229608
]
Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12893:
----------------------------------------
Thanks Allen and Colin for comments.
bq. The way we handle the native dependencies in the LICENSE and NOTICE files
right now is correct.
Agreed.
bq. Can you be clearer about what licensing issues you think exist beyond the
javascript?
leveldbjni is an example. leveldbjni-all-1.8.jar is included in the binary
tarball, so I'm thinking we should add the following license to LICENSE.txt
when releasing binary tarball.
https://github.com/fusesource/leveldbjni/blob/master/license.txt
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
> Verify LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12893
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12893
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 3.0.0, 2.7.3, 2.6.5
> Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
> Priority: Blocker
>
> We have many bundled dependencies in both the source and the binary artifacts
> that are not in LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
