[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15336748#comment-15336748
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HADOOP-13263:
----------------------------------------
Thank you for the updated patch [~sodonnell]. This is looking good. A few
comments:
# We can use
[AtomicLong|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicLong.html]
in place of {{Counter}}.
# The {{if (executorService == null)}} check in reload should be protected with
a synchronized block.
# This exception block in {{reload}} exists just to increment the counter.
Instead you can have a boolean {{success}} that is set to true at the end of
the try block. You can increment {{backgroundRefreshException}} in {{finally}}
if the boolean is false.
# Nitpick: {{new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>()}} can be replaced with {{new
LinkedBlockingQueue<>()}}.
Rest lgtm. I am still reviewing the tests (thank you for the extensive new
tests!).
> Reload cached groups in background after expiry
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13263
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13263
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Stephen O'Donnell
> Assignee: Stephen O'Donnell
> Attachments: HADOOP-13263.001.patch, HADOOP-13263.002.patch
>
>
> In HADOOP-11238 the Guava cache was introduced to allow refreshes on the
> Namenode group cache to run in the background, avoiding many slow group
> lookups. Even with this change, I have seen quite a few clusters with issues
> due to slow group lookups. The problem is most prevalent in HA clusters,
> where a slow group lookup on the hdfs user can fail to return for over 45
> seconds causing the Failover Controller to kill it.
> The way the current Guava cache implementation works is approximately:
> 1) On initial load, the first thread to request groups for a given user
> blocks until it returns. Any subsequent threads requesting that user block
> until that first thread populates the cache.
> 2) When the key expires, the first thread to hit the cache after expiry
> blocks. While it is blocked, other threads will return the old value.
> I feel it is this blocking thread that still gives the Namenode issues on
> slow group lookups. If the call from the FC is the one that blocks and
> lookups are slow, if can cause the NN to be killed.
> Guava has the ability to refresh expired keys completely in the background,
> where the first thread that hits an expired key schedules a background cache
> reload, but still returns the old value. Then the cache is eventually
> updated. This patch introduces this background reload feature. There are two
> new parameters:
> 1) hadoop.security.groups.cache.background.reload - default false to keep the
> current behaviour. Set to true to enable a small thread pool and background
> refresh for expired keys
> 2) hadoop.security.groups.cache.background.reload.threads - only relevant if
> the above is set to true. Controls how many threads are in the background
> refresh pool. Default is 1, which is likely to be enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
