[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16094034#comment-16094034
]
Bharat Viswanadham commented on HADOOP-14672:
---------------------------------------------
Hi [~djp]
org/w3c/dom/, org/w3c/dom/, org/xml/sax/* and org/xml/sax/**/* are excluded
from shading as these packages are part of the JDK.
[~busbey]
Uploaded the patch to fix the classes which are missed from shading. Could you
please have a look in to this patch.
And also one more thing, as these classes package is little different than
conventional, it is missed. So, in future if there are jars with package name
changes, we need to update the pom.xml right?
Have not found any solution for this in general for relocating classes. Please
let me know if i am missing something here.
Testing will identify the issues, but code update of pom.xml will be needed for
all shaded jars. Is my understanding correct?
> Shaded Hadoop-client-minicluster include unshaded classes, like: javax, sax,
> dom, etc.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14672
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14672
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Junping Du
> Assignee: Bharat Viswanadham
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-14672.patch
>
>
> The shaded hadoop-client-minicluster shouldn't include any unshaded
> dependencies, but we can see: javax, dom, sax, etc. are all unshaded.
> CC [~busbey]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
