[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17177962#comment-17177962
]
Chao Sun commented on HADOOP-17165:
-----------------------------------
Sorry for the delay on my reply [~tasanuma]. The Dynamometer result looks good
so I think we can proceed with this. Like you mentioned above, I think we still
need something like HADOOP-15016 and we should think how this can evolve to
that in future or don't get replaced by that. cc [~fengnanli], [~xkrogen] who
might be interested.
Other than that, I only have some cosmetic comments on the patch:
1. can we use {{Set<String>}} as return type and field type instead of
{{HashSet<String>}}?
Looking forward to your PR and I'll continue review there.
> Implement service-user feature in DecayRPCScheduler
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-17165
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17165
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Takanobu Asanuma
> Assignee: Takanobu Asanuma
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-17165.001.patch, HADOOP-17165.002.patch,
> after.png, before.png
>
>
> In our cluster, we want to use FairCallQueue to limit heavy users, but not
> want to restrict certain users who are submitting important requests. This
> jira proposes to implement the service-user feature that the user is always
> scheduled high-priority queue.
> According to HADOOP-9640, the initial concept of FCQ has this feature, but
> not implemented finally.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
