haiyang1987 opened a new pull request, #5063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5063

   In DatanodeAdminManager#activate
   
   ```
   int blocksPerInterval = conf.getInt(
       DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY,
       DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_DEFAULT);
   
   final String deprecatedKey =
       "dfs.namenode.decommission.nodes.per.interval";
   final String strNodes = conf.get(deprecatedKey);
   if (strNodes != null) {
     LOG.warn("Deprecated configuration key {} will be ignored.",
         deprecatedKey);
     LOG.warn("Please update your configuration to use {} instead.",
         DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
   }
   
   checkArgument(blocksPerInterval > 0,
       "Must set a positive value for "
       + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_BLOCKS_PER_INTERVAL_KEY);
   
   final int maxConcurrentTrackedNodes = conf.getInt(
       DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES,
       DFSConfigKeys
           .DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES_DEFAULT);
   checkArgument(maxConcurrentTrackedNodes >= 0, "Cannot set a negative " +
       "value for "
       + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_DECOMMISSION_MAX_CONCURRENT_TRACKED_NODES);
   ```
   there is no need for parameters
   dfs.namenode.decommission.blocks.per.interval and
   dfs.namenode.decommission.max.concurrent.tracked.nodes to verify.
   Because the parameters are processed in DatanodeAdminMonitorBase and 
DatanodeAdminDefaultMonitor.
   ### Description of PR
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to