[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13207833#comment-13207833
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-7557:
--------------------------------------
> Based on the version number in the boot header we can call into an rpc engine
> that supports the 20 format
So the single motivating use case for the RPCEngine abstraction would not read
the RPCEngine implementation-independent headers. That doesn't seem like a
good abstraction.
But we're not making any progress here. My suggestions are not affecting the
design. So I'll stop trying to help, step away, and let you get on with it.
I've stopped watching this issue. Good luck!
> Make IPC header be extensible
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-7557
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sanjay Radia
> Assignee: Sanjay Radia
> Attachments: HADOOP-7557.patch, IpcHeader.proto, ipcHeader1.patch,
> ipcHeader2.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
