vt921102 commented on PR #8693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/8693#issuecomment-6407064032

   Gentle ping on this backport.
   
   #8692 (`branch-3.5`) was merged on 12 Oct, and HADOOP-19973 is now Reopened 
to
   track this remaining `branch-3.4` cherry-pick. Could **3.4.4** be added back 
to
   Fix Version/s when this one goes in?
   
   Status as of today:
   
   - **Apache Yetus: +1 overall**, no negative rows.
   - `continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge`: green.
   - **Integration validation: done and posted on 12 Oct** (comment above). Full
     `hadoop-azure` suite, patched vs baseline on the same VM and the same ADLS 
Gen2
     account, **on Windows and on JDK 8** — 1531 vs 1530 tests, 39 unique 
failing
     entries each of which 38 are identical, the two differences being known 
flaky
     tests that cancel out. `TestAbfsClient` goes 2 -> 3 tests, both runs with 
zero
     failures, which is the part that proves the JUnit 4 adaptation in this 
backport
     compiles and passes under Java 8.
   - The red **`Build`** check is structural, not a real failure: it is the 
GitHub
     Actions `build_and_test.yml` reusable workflow, added to trunk by 
HADOOP-19858
     after `branch-3.4` was cut, so `notify_test_workflow.yml` can never find a 
run
     for it and it reports `action_required` on every `branch-3.4` PR. Recent
     `branch-3.4` merges have all gone in with it red.
   
   Why this branch matters to us: `branch-3.4` is the last Hadoop line 
supporting
   Java 8, which our product still runs on, so we cannot pick the fix up from 
3.5.1.
   And the defect only reproduces where `File.separator` is a backslash — so 
Windows
   plus JDK 8 is exactly the combination this backport needs to be verified on,
   which is what the run above covers.
   
   The PR still merges cleanly on the current `branch-3.4` head (`95ca3f0ccd`). 
If
   you would rather see results against that head than against the commit I 
tested,
   say the word and I will rebase and re-run the Windows/JDK 8 validation.
   
   @anujmodi2021 — would you be able to merge this, or point me at whatever is 
still
   missing? @steveloughran, cc'ing you since you merged the 3.5 cherry-pick, 
but no
   rush given your break.
   
   Thanks!
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to