[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13669681#comment-13669681
 ] 

Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-9421:
-------------------------------------

I still think there's confusion here.  I'm not proposing per-call SASL.  The 
SASL negotiation sequence is wrapped in a fake callId in response to the 
connection header.  It will simplify the client & server and open future 
possibilities.

The session idea is interesting, but it closes the door on the server requiring 
multiple mechanism - ex. with all the other auth suggestions, maybe if the 
server auths a token, it will want to demand auth of an identity token or 
similar.

I'm not sure using proxy/super-user authentication is desirable for 
multiplexing.  If I have a process servicing multiple UGIs, I doesn't 
necessarily want that process to have hdfs "root" privileges.  I want each 
multiplexed connection to use its specific token.  For multiplexing to be 
feasible and remain async, the server must be able to determine what each 
received packet is - rpc call or sasl auth call.
                
> Convert SASL to use ProtoBuf and add lengths for non-blocking processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9421
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9421
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9421.patch, HADOOP-9421.patch, 
> HADOOP-9421-v2-demo.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to