[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13671821#comment-13671821
 ] 

Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-9517:
--------------------------------------

bq. I vote to strengthen the compatibility requirements for user data file 
formats. ... Rather we'd like to permit both writers or readers of data files 
to be upgraded independently. ...
Agreed. 
What do you mean by user data file formats? Do you mean data files that are 
processed by libraries in user land (as opposed to a server). Would   har 
files, sequence files and RC files  be such "user data file formats"? To ground 
this better, Doug could you please give some examples of kinds of updates one 
would want to do  and of those which  would be allowed and which would not.
                
> Document Hadoop Compatibility
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch, 
> hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch, 
> hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch
>
>
> As we get ready to call hadoop-2 stable we need to better define 'Hadoop 
> Compatibility'.
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Compatibility is a start, let's document 
> requirements clearly and completely.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to