[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14228002#comment-14228002
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-11341:
------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12684119/HADOOP-11341.2.patch
against trunk revision c1f2bb2.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5128//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5128//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Add support for root key KMS ACLs
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11341
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11341
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: kms, security
> Reporter: Arun Suresh
> Assignee: Arun Suresh
> Attachments: HADOOP-11341.1.patch, HADOOP-11341.2.patch
>
>
> As reported by [~dian.fu] :
> Key based ACL in KMS is currently implemented as whitelist. So if I configure
> as follows in kms-acl.xml,
> {code}
> <property>
> <name>key.acl.testKey.DECRYPT_EEK</name>
> <value>testUser</value>
> </property>
> {code}, then only {{testUser}} user can do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} call on key
> {{testKey}}. If I want {{yarn}} user can also do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} call on
> {{testKey}} key, I need add {{yarn}} user to the above configuration value
> manually. This means that if I want to configure key based
> ACL({{DECRYPT_EEK}}) for {{some key}}, I need also add {{yarn}} user to
> configuration {{DECRYPT_EEK}} for that key. As I don't know if {{yarn}} user
> will later need to do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} for this key.. This is inconvenient and
> tricky.
> This can be alleviated by slightly modifying the key ACL logic in KMS first
> checks if the user, in this case {{yarn}}, is present in
> {{key.acl.<key-name>.<OP-name>}} list. And if not, then also check if the
> user is present in {{default.key.acl.<OP-name>}}. If yes, then grant access..
> else deny.
> Currently, {{default.key.acl.<OP-name>}} is consulted only if NO
> {{key.acl.<key-name>.<OP-name>}} is specified.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
