[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14617219#comment-14617219
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-11903:
-------------------------------------------
bq. I don't know what CLASSNAME_RE=${i#*=} since I couldn't google it, does but
it doesn't look like a set
It's setting the parameter from the command line...
So you'd run test-patch --classname-re='(foo|bar)' or whatever.
bq. Should this be unit tested? Is that a thing in Yetus?
HADOOP-12137
> test-patch should fail any new classes called Default-foo
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11903
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11903
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: yetus
> Affects Versions: HADOOP-12111
> Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
> Assignee: Kengo Seki
> Attachments: HADOOP-11903.HADOOP-12111.00.patch
>
>
> In the past, we've named things like DefaultResourceCalculator,
> DefaultContainerExecutor, and DefaultCodec that do nothing but cause problems
> down the road since they are effectively version and functionality locked
> forever. If these examples had been named what they truly were (e.g.,
> MemoryResourceCalculator, SimpleContainerExecutor, and GZipCodec), the
> defaults could then be changed in the future in a compatible way.
> One way to enforce this is to prevent the creation of new classes called
> Default-anything.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
