Hi,
[you add stuff at the bottom and I add at the top... :-) ]
[...]
> I agree with a lot of your points, and disagree with a few others,
> however there are two things that made me start this vote now:
As I said before: I'm +1 for moving to Apache DB. But I'd like it to go
through incubation to get these points cleared up. I'd love to nuke
torque-gen in the long run if commons-sql evolves to be a solid
foundation for an OJB _and_ Torque code/SQL generator. So everyone wins.
Incubation can help with this.
If commons-sql moves directly to DB, there will be a fixed set of
committers and pressure (from OJB) to "get a release out". And if this
one is locked into being OJB centric, then me (as a Torque guy) don't
even start looking into the project.
Incubation IMHO can help the Torque _and_ the OJB people to find a
common ground.
[... cutting out technical parts which will not help to find a decision
...]
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
--Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
