Mario Ivankovits wrote on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 3:03 PM: >> Well, the number is dependent on the strategy we are trying to >> achieve: >> >> a) using '4' would indicate that every major version will > have a new package name, but then you can't use a major > version to just remove deprections (a compatible major version change) >> >> b) using '5' would indicate the technology reason for the > version. The package would be commons-collections5-1.0. >> >> c) using '5' as the commons name - commons5-collections-1.0 >> > d) using '2' would just indicate a "major major" next generation > release. The package would be commons-collections2-1.0. > > I'd prefer (d) as then we can have a commons-collections3 in > the future > if needed without having it to couple to a JDK version, in > case the fork > is not coupled to a new technology brought by the JVM.
(d) +1 IMHO the best solution for the complete unsatisfying topic. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
