From: Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, the number is dependent on the strategy we are trying to achieve: > > > > a) using '4' would indicate that every major version will have a new > > package name, but then you can't use a major version to just remove > > deprections (a compatible major version change) > > > > b) using '5' would indicate the technology reason for the version. The > > package would be commons-collections5-1.0. > > > > c) using '5' as the commons name - commons5-collections-1.0 > > > d) using '2' would just indicate a "major major" next generation > release. The package would be commons-collections2-1.0.
> I'd prefer (d) as then we can have a commons-collections3 in the future > if needed without having it to couple to a JDK version, in case the fork > is not coupled to a new technology brought by the JVM. I believe that our users will find "5 == JDK5" to be an easier concept to grasp. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
